Better get over to Youtube and let these people know that they're not fooling you.
willisnewton says:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SearchingMind says:
SearchingMind says:
@ willisnewton
I think you defeat your own argument when you at the same time, on the one hand argue that “ Actually, he’s not wrong on anything I can tell”, and on the other hand that “He is MISSING a lot, but what he speaks to seems factually correct”.
By the way, this “expert” did his demo standing face to face with his “victim”, both hands fully stretched and aimed at the “victim’s” heart. GZ claims that he was lying on his back with Trayvon mounted on his stomach, straddling, suffocating him, etc. Also, when the kill shot was fired, GZ’s elbow was on the ground, bent and extended to the right away from his body. From that position, GZ could not have made the same shot produced in the demo of this “expert”. There is NO SUBSTANTIVE relationship between the demo of this “expert” and the Zimmerman-scenario. Applying the results of the demo to GZ is a serious non-sequitur (no relationship between premise and conclusion; conclusion does not logically flow/follw from the premise). Based on that it is also hard to see how this “expert” “seems factually correct” (whatever you mean by that).
FREDRICK LEATHERMAN'S LAW BLOG
LLMPapa Strikes again:
========================================================
I think you defeat your own argument when you at the same time, on the one hand argue that “ Actually, he’s not wrong on anything I can tell”, and on the other hand that “He is MISSING a lot, but what he speaks to seems factually correct”.
By the way, this “expert” did his demo standing face to face with his “victim”, both hands fully stretched and aimed at the “victim’s” heart. GZ claims that he was lying on his back with Trayvon mounted on his stomach, straddling, suffocating him, etc. Also, when the kill shot was fired, GZ’s elbow was on the ground, bent and extended to the right away from his body. From that position, GZ could not have made the same shot produced in the demo of this “expert”. There is NO SUBSTANTIVE relationship between the demo of this “expert” and the Zimmerman-scenario. Applying the results of the demo to GZ is a serious non-sequitur (no relationship between premise and conclusion; conclusion does not logically flow/follw from the premise). Based on that it is also hard to see how this “expert” “seems factually correct” (whatever you mean by that).
FREDRICK LEATHERMAN'S LAW BLOG
LLMPapa Strikes again:
========================================================
Let’s Go To The Video Tapes!
by blushedbrown
Various
blogs have been talking about the "Tapes". The surveillance tapes of
Kohl's, Sam's Club, and Lake Edge Apts. It's like Nixon all over
again, except it's the "video tapes", not just audio tapes. The
speculations and outright lies regarding Trayvon Martin now have him
looking into cars, casing houses, etc. We know these are the common
tactics used by the Pro-Z camps. The perceived notion that a young
black teenager had to be doing SOMETHING in order to justify, in their
sick twisted minds, being killed by the hands of George Zimmerman.
They rant and rave that O'mara has the proof on those surveillance tapes. HA! How wrong they are!