starts at 9am Orlando EST

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Robert Zimmerman on the Bill Maher Show - Feb 15, 2013

Friday, February 15, 2013

Trayvon's Screams

xy11xyxy11xy·116 videos

Why Did George Kill Trayvon? xy11xyxy11xy·116 videos

George Zimmerman's Magnitude 9 Lie

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Examining the Evidence in the George Zimmerman Case - Feb 8, 2013

Better get over to Youtube and let these people know that they're not fooling you.

willisnewton says:

Trayvon Martin 911 Call: How Experts ID Voices

 George Zimmerman poses for a mug shot in this 2005
booking photo in Florida. Voiceprint analysts have
said the voice calling for help on a 9-11 tape is not his.
Orange County Sheriff's Office via Getty Images


- Biometric voice analysis is the new fingerprinting.
- Software can compare voices to a high degree of scientific certainty.
- With samples of Trayvon Martin's voice, experts may be able to identify screams on 911 tape.
In classic whodunnit mysteries, detectives and FBI agents dust for fingerprints to solve mysteries and collect court-admissible evidence.
In real life, it's more often the voice that offers the tell-tale evidence, since technology to recognize voices in recordings has become so much more sophisticated.
The Feb. 26 recording of a 911 call by a woman who reported someone crying out for help in her gated community in Sanford, Fla., could be a key piece of evidence in the Trayvon Martin murder case, especially since she called early enough so that screams for help and the gunshot were recorded.
George Zimmerman, a Neighborhood Watch volunteer, shot Martin, an unarmed 17-year-old. Why he did so remains a hotly argued topic, with Zimmerman claiming Martin attacked and beat him.

NEWS: Computer Software Decodes Emotions Over the Phone


Wednesday, February 13, 2013

New Forensic Analysis Makes Damning Conclusions For George Zimmerman

Published by at 4:41 pm under All General Discussions,Trayvon Martin Case


So what is this new forensic analysis? It shows George Zimmerman’s concocted story is not true or accurate to the death scene details, 9-11 call timelines and testimony:
Among his conclusions:
  • If Zimmerman’s retelling of the event were accurate, the confrontation Zimmerman described with Martin would have occurred much sooner than it actually did;
  • Zimmerman covered more time and distance after leaving his truck that night than he revealed to police;
  • based on the times and distances Zimmerman said he covered, Zimmerman would have still been on the phone with Sanford police when he claims he was attacked by Martin;
  • had Martin walked directly to his destination, his father’s girlfriend’s townhome, he would have made it there safely before Zimmerman ended his nonemergency call to Sanford police;
  • Martin was in fact leaning over Zimmerman when the fatal shot was fired, just as Zimmerman has maintained.
I  must point out that the last bullet is not conclusive and most likely wrong, and it will backfire on Zimmerman’s case. As presented in this story and accompanying video, a simulated firing  against test clothing shows nothing more than a 3″ gap between the hoodie and Trayvon’s chest. That is the only sound conclusion. The jump to the uninformed conclusion that this 3″gap  means Trayvon was sitting astride Zimmerman, with his shirt hanging down is wrong. Demonstrably wrong.

This is not the only position from which this arrangement of hoodie and chest can be achieved. Moreover, the bullet’s path (if we have the right trajectory) won’t support the story’s conclusion. I noted this in a post back when the first round of evidence showed up. First off, understand the mechanics of the human body and human arm when firing a gun.  When on your back, with elbow against the ground (as Zimmerman himself testified), there is only a small range of trajectories a bullet will travel. Here is diagram one, show the range of the arm holding a gun from the back: READ MORE


Sunday, February 10, 2013