I hope that these women jurors consider what an acquittal will mean for future events that are similar to this.
1. They will be authorizing NW'ers to become vigilantes.
2. Allow NW'ers to carry weapons.
3. Authorize and allow NW'ers to go on patrols.
4. Authorize NW'ers to chase, grab and detain "suspects".
5. Approve of followers of children to refuse to identify themselves.
6. Authorize NW'ers to shoot "suspects" if they meet any resistance.
7. Since they will be validating the above behavior as lawful the child being followed,
captured and detained, will have nothing to report to the police, since the actions are
Your child can be followed, chased, captured and held by an armed civilian, who needs only to claim that your child was a "suspect" and that will be legal and therefore there will be nothing
either you or the police can do about it. That would certainly give pedophiles and perverts a
good head start on accomplishing their aims, if caught they merely need claim to have pursued
and captured a "suspect" as a lawful cover for their actions.
Even worse you must then instruct your children that it is legal for them to be be followed and
held by complete strangers who are armed, and that they must not resist, because these actions
are approved by law. So that life in Florida becomes every parents worse nightmare.
Zimmerman Trial Computer Animation: Will the Jury See It?
On Tuesday evening, outside the presence of the jury,
attorneys for the prosecution and the defense debated about the
admissibility of a computer animation that the defense wants to show in
The animation, which depicts the events that led up to the shooting
of Trayvon Martin on February 26, 2012, is based on witness accounts,
coroner reports, police reports, and photographs of the crime scene. It
was created by crime scene animator Daniel Schumaker, who used a
motion-capture system to produce the animation.
State prosecutor Rich Mantei has filed a motion
to keep the video out of evidence. He alleges that the video fails to
“represent a complete or accurate record of the evidence.” He notes that
the lighting of the video is inaccurate, and says the animation
deliberately leaves out the murder weapon. Mantei also claims that the
video relies heavily on Zimmerman’s version of events.
While the defense says the video will help jurors to visualize the
sequence of events that proceeded the shooting, the prosecution says
that the animation will only serve to confuse.
The following is a different animation of the shooting that was
produced in March 2012. It was produced in just a month, but the quality
is surprisingly decent. READ MORE
Zimmerman is claiming the screams as his, while there are plenty of people who believe they are not his. The jury, however, may decide that there is enough evidence to believe that it is him screaming. If they reach such a conclusion then, the evidence also shows he's not being subjected to any deadly assault by the unarmed teen. How can it be? His claimed rendition of the "fight" includes actions that most certainly would have left evidence on Trayvon's hands, after all, all the other dna evidence survived the rain and other mishandling, so they have a problem. They might, very well choose to solve that problem by considering that, Zimmerman screamed only to make it appear that he was suffering a lethal attack, so that he could claim self defense after he shot Trayvon. Wouldn't that be karma? To wind up convicted because of the very screams he stole to defend himself? What a "revolting development that would be in his view.
*Friday, as the prosecution wrapped up what some observers call an inept presentation in the George Zimmerman 2nd degree murder trial, MSNBC's Rev. Al Sharpton put in his two cents.
the rev is saying makes a whole lot of sense to a lot of folks.
Basically Zimmerman's story doesn't add up because the man who killed
Trayvon Martin didn’t used his “MMA” training to fight back against the
17-year-old instead of pulling out his gun.
he was raining blows, MMA-style, you think there would be some physical
evidence of that on his fists," Sharpton said about Trayvon,
hypothetically. "Second, it was testified that Zimmerman had MMA
training. If Zimmerman had MMA training and there was an MMA attack
going on, why didn’t he use his MMA training to defend himself?”
Hmm, lyeah, that is a good question. Wonder what Zimmerman's answer would be READ MORE
of the many lies of George Zimmerman cast a huge shadow over his
version of events and his ever sinking Stand Your Ground defense. The problem with lies is sometimes they ultimately catch up and meet the truth.We will soon find out if Zimmerman’s lies will land him in jail for Trayvon Martin’s death.
George Zimmerman’s defense rests on Florida’s Stand Your Ground law enacted in 2005.The prosecution claims that Zimmerman was a wanna be cop who knew the Stand Your Ground Law and suggests he might know how to get away with murder using self- defense. Zimmerman told Fox News host Sean Hannity in an interviewon July 18, 2012
that he knew nothing about Stand Your Ground laws before the incident.
One of Zimmerman’s Seminole County State college professors, Alexis
Carter, who taught a criminal law course involving extensive Stand Your Ground laws
where Zimmerman was a student in 2010, testified that he remembers
Zimmerman for being one of his better students who got an A grade in the
knew the Stand Your Ground law better than most others, perhaps good
enough to try to get away with murder.READ MORE