by EurPublisher
*Friday, as the prosecution wrapped up what some observers call an inept presentation in the George Zimmerman 2nd degree murder trial, MSNBC's Rev. Al Sharpton put in his two cents.
What
the rev is saying makes a whole lot of sense to a lot of folks.
Basically Zimmerman's story doesn't add up because the man who killed
Trayvon Martin didn’t used his “MMA” training to fight back against the
17-year-old instead of pulling out his gun.
“If
he was raining blows, MMA-style, you think there would be some physical
evidence of that on his fists," Sharpton said about Trayvon,
hypothetically. "Second, it was testified that Zimmerman had MMA
training. If Zimmerman had MMA training and there was an MMA attack
going on, why didn’t he use his MMA training to defend himself?”
Hmm, lyeah, that is a good question. Wonder what Zimmerman's answer would be READ MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it Civil. Ignoring the evidence will not be allowed!
Thank you.