Lonnie Starr has been working this case displaying high intelligence
with the focus and determination of a dog working a bone. Pity the
hapless and extremely over-matched defendant and his defense team. Just
don’t get carried away feeling sorry for them.
He also has written the two White House petitions seeking a federal
investigation of the defendant for violating Trayvon Martin’s civil
rights and an end to the SYG laws.
Here is his theory of the case as he presented it in two comments this morning on the
Tempest in a Teapot thread. Please read it and join the discussion below.
If you like this article, please consider sharing and liking it by
clicking on the buttons immediately below and making a financial
contribution by clicking on the yellow donation button in the upper
right part of this page just below the blue banner containing my name
and the name of the blog.
Thank you.
Fred
*************************
Unlike most investigators, I gather facts and work forward from
there, creating an imaginary narrative that puts all the facts in
place. Then I examine the details that don’t fit, and I then work
backwards to see where they can be fitted. After I have a good
narrative that accounts for as much as I can, then I sort of try to
view it “from the side lines”, looking for the nexus of critical
details, in other words, if this had happened, then this is what had
to have been taking place as well. Then you take a closer look at what
had to have happened along side what did happen, and if the narrative
is false, insurmountable obstacles/anomalies appear.
Evidence can only lie by being contrived to give a false impression.
People, however, have more options to falsify. So, believe the
evidence more than the people who observe it, but only believe the
evidence itself, if you cannot imagine that it has been contrived. If
it is possible to contrive evidence, then it is possible to fool
witnesses, and this is exactly the objective of the criminal mind.
So, you work backward, then forward and backwards again and take
looks from the sides, it’s like panning for nuggets of gold. The chaff
and waste eventually washes away, leaving the hard stuff behind.
It puzzled me for a long time, why a law student, would go out on a
hunt that both the law and the rules of NW definitively prohibited.
What would be the percentage in that? He’d have broken every rule and
the law besides! How could he think that would make him a hero? When,
any fool could see, all he’d wind up with is a harmless kid being held,
who had a right to be in the neighborhood. What could he possibly do
in that event? The answer is, kill the kid! That’s the only thing
that prevents the comparisons from being made. But that is only a
stall, since the truth would probably come out anyway.
So then, what does GZ need to make the planned hunt okay, despite
the laws and the rules? The answer is: evidence that a crime had been
committed. So then the question is “what kind of crime can be carried
and displayed under a wide variety of circumstances”? The answer is:
Bloody wounds! They can be claimed to have happened outside of the
sight of any witnesses who later appear. They are hard to refute
because, it’s hard to believe that a “pillar of the community” would
actually harm himself, for the purpose of misleading the public, about
a crime, it doesn’t appear he would or could plan.
But think about it, if George leaves his house bleeding from
carefully designed wounds, he has a “crime” that can be used in a
variety of ways, to excuse all breaking of rules and justify breaking
the law as well. Those wounds were designed to shield him from the
prohibitions of rules and laws. But, because they were created before
any other actions were taken, they must not be professionally examined,
if the time of their creation could be determined at all. This means
that the creation of these wounds could not be left to chance. They are
an integral part of the nights activities, however or whatever else
happens. Only the how of obtaining them need be changed to fit what
actually takes place.
This leaving home on the hunt for this project, is a “high octane”
emotional performance, that required dedicated intent. It is likely
that medication and alcohol, which lowers inhibitions and increases
calm, would be taken to steady the nerves. If so, it adds yet another
reason why the ER must be avoided at all costs, and of course, to
accomplish that, the wounds must be and remain superficial, and not
require professional treatment.
Next up is GZ undoing himself. He rehearsed a plausible story,
probably several. As a NW, who knows that he cannot be either on
patrol or following, he leaves home with a story about going shopping.
To cover up notification, he “spots” his target over by FT’s cut
through, a good story for night time affairs, since it comes through a
“strange” area. (Of course, we are later to learn it wasn’t so
strange to find people walking that way at all).
But George has his bloody head wounds to shield himself, which ever
way the story plays out. The first problem arises, he can’t find the
target, where he has been told to look. So he retraces his path,
looking to pick up the trail. (tchoupi’s work), His fellow Watchers
see his predicament and call him to correct his error, by pointing out
that the target is still there at the mailboxes. George goes back and
spots him, and there the play begins.
According to the script, GZ needs to frighten his target into
engaging actions that can be portrayed as strange. He accomplishes this
by shining his lights on the target as he shelters in the mail shed.
Unbeknownst to GZ, however, his target is on the phone and gives
notice of GZ’s hostile presence. So, an explanation of TM’s actions
from that point onward are explained. Bad news for GZ!
When TM leaves the shelter of the mail boxes, it is actually raining
harder than it was when he first got there. Meaning he was already
spooked. But he contains himself enough to walk, probably out of GZ’s
sight before he actually runs. However, GZ has his little defense
shield in place, and since this gives him the lattitude he needs to
break the rules and the law, he sets up the scene with “he’s running”
to the NEN operator, then he exits his car. This one cannot get away,
because George has intentions that will not allow it to happen that
way. Meanwhile TM is unaware of how dangerous the situation really is,
so he quickly assesses that not seeing GZ, means that he’s no longer
being followed, and continues his walk home. Only to find GZ behind
him again.
GZ intends to grab and hold TM for the police, using his wounds as a
reason and lawful cause for doing so. That would make him a hero, if
it would play out that way. Only trouble was, TM was still extremely
childish far beyond his years. If only TM was more mature, the story
would have worked. But, since TM was so extremely childlike, the
planned story would quickly reveal as absurd. A whining, crying child
asking for his momma, isn’t going to sell as a thug of any kind. GZ
blames TM’s lack of maturity for inexplicably thwarting his heroic plans
and decides that TM’s demeanor and character must not be allowed to
display. By killing TM he accomplishes, preventing immediate challenge
to his claims of attack, while making himself the only credible
witness of all the events of that night.
GZ had a well rehearsed story, for how things transpired. In his
drug and alcohol induced state, he can do no more than recite it
verbatim. It all occurred at the “T”, where he did not follow TM, but
was instead attacked while attempting to retreat. The trouble is, he
was unable to modify the story as needed, thus he cannot account for
the fact that the body is 40.5 feet away from where it needs to be, for
the purpose of his well rehearsed story.
This story could have easily been modified to account for this
distance south of the ‘T’, but Georges becalmed state, as evidenced by
his bio stats, precluded critical thinking.
READ MORE IN THE COMMENTS AT THIS SITE CLICK HERE